A digital marketing specialist with over 8 years of experience in SEO and content creation, passionate about helping businesses thrive online.
Authorities in Hong Kong have taken into custody thirteen individuals on suspected charges of manslaughter in connection with last week’s devastating fire, amidst growing public outcry over the detentions of citizens demanding responsibility.
Emergency services persisted in combing through the seven towers of the Wang Fuk Court residential area in Tai Po on the start of the week, following the city’s deadliest fire in seven and a half decades. The number of fatalities reached one hundred and fifty-one and is anticipated to climb further as the operation continues. About forty people are still missing.
The estate, housing nearly 5,000 people, had been in the midst of major refurbishment that have been associated with the origin of the blaze. In the wake of the tragedy, anger has escalated over alleged previous safety breaches by the contractor working at the site and poor oversight of safety codes, spurred on by disclosures that occupants had been voicing concerns over the renovations for a year.
On Monday afternoon, authorities said anti-corruption authorities had arrested thirteen people over the tragedy so far, including the executives and an technical advisor of a contracting firm, and had “immediately begun a thorough probe along the lines of involuntary manslaughter”.
A senior official stated that 7 of twenty tested specimens of the mesh netting used around the towers did not meet flame-resistance requirements. Preliminary checks had found samples were compliant, but the spokesperson said the cheaper, substandard material had been installed in areas difficult to access in order to avoid discovery, labeling it a “shameful act”.
“Their sole aim was to make money at the cost of human lives,” he said.
As accusations of safety lapses grow, alongside reports that official bodies had issued several seemingly ignored cautions, the public have questioned why no officials have yet faced consequences. Instead, two civilians were allegedly arrested by security forces.
A person, identified as a Hong Kong student, was arrested over an internet appeal that made “four requests” for guaranteed support for the affected families and accountability for those at to blame, including any corrupt or culpable public servants.
Reports said the individual was arrested for “inciting disaffection”. Law enforcement did not verify the detention, saying only that they “will take actions according to the situation and in accordance with the law”.
Local media also reported the detention of a former district councillor.
Asked about the arrests, the security chief said there had been “inaccurate comments online” that were intended to undermine national security. “As a result, we must take necessary steps, including police action,” the secretary told a press conference. “Operational details cannot be disclosed as they concern state security.”
On local online platforms, people criticised the arrests of civilians. “State security must be given precedence even if the victims are still buried in the structure,” said a comment.
Several users drew comparisons to mainland China. “There, these crimes are called ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’,” said one commenter. “It’s usually met with heavy sentences. Social order overrides everything.”
Another said: “Since we are following mainland China’s methods, by dealing with the individual who raises the question, nobody will dare to ask, and thus Hong Kong’s governance will have no issues.”
The detentions followed advisories by national security authorities that they would crack down on anyone considered to be using the tragedy to stir up “hostile” sentiment.
Prior to the arrests, authorities had already demonstrated increased vigilance to the community response. Following the quelling of earlier protests, civilian gatherings have been tightly controlled. In the immediate aftermath, volunteer supporters quickly organized relief efforts, with hundreds of people employing cars and public transport to bring in large quantities of garments, supplies and other essentials for the survivors.
Nevertheless, by nightfall, officers were monitoring the area, and public authorities eventually assumed control from the volunteer organisers.
The appeal over which the student was reportedly arrested was initiated late on Friday. Its “four demands” echoed the language of past protest movements but did not advocate systemic reform.
The student informed reporters that he was only “putting forward very basic requests”.
“Should these suggestions are deemed seditious or ‘transgressive’, then I believe I cannot foresee the consequences of anything any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is correct,” he said.
A digital marketing specialist with over 8 years of experience in SEO and content creation, passionate about helping businesses thrive online.